[Lincolnparkdc] FINAL PLANS and DDOT's eventual solution to safety

[Marche Maine]

I do not see it as a war on cars but as an assertion of the equal rights of
alternative transport modes.  The luxury of easy car parking is no longer
going to come at the expense of safe travel for bikers, scooters, walkers.

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 2:14 PM Margaret Rafferty <mhrafferty at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Nicely stated Yanis. Thank you.
>
> Margaret
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 1:44 PM, Yannis Labrou <labrou at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Reading a recent posting citing 2 awful incidents where the vehicle
> operators did not observe current laws (and then some), I sense that DDOT's
> solution to public safety is to address whatever vehicle operators do even
> when they do not observe signs and traffic laws. Hence, the solution is to
> make it harder and harder to own and operate a vehicle in Washington DC.
> Fewer cars, fewer drivers, fewer miles driven, fewer incidents ... thus
> goes the reasoning. Let's call a spade a spade. Our lost parking spots,
> no-data decisions, no data-based assessments, traffic-calming eye-sores all
> over the Hill, etc. are just collateral damage to a flawed thinking in
> my opinion.
>
> Incidentally, the mentioned horrific incident of the 4 year old boy being
> struck by a car (and killed) happened in NW. In terms of relevance to our
> street's bike lanes etc., it might as well have happened in MD or VA. It is
> not relevant to the specifics of our street in terms of improving safety.
> Here is a link to the accident
>
> https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/4-year-old-boy-struck-and-killed-by-suv-in-northwest-dc/2627621/
> Indicative of the current thinking, is the following excerpt from the
> story:
>            "Many residents, including Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner
> Erik Lindsjo, have been pressing to make Georgia Avenue safer for
> pedestrians and bicyclists.
>             There’s no reason in a city where you shouldn’t drive over 20
> mph anyways to have this many lanes dedicated to traffic,” Lindsjo said.
> “You’re inviting tragedy.”
>
> Yes .. take the lanes away (hmmm, Georgia Ave has two lanes in each
> direction at that intersection... make it a single lane each way?) ...
> Well, unless there are fewer cars, the same cars will "spread" to other
> lanes, presumably not intended for that many cars. Oh ... no worries ...
> DDOT will make these other lanes undriveable. Hold on ... won't drivers do
> stupid things because they do not want to spend twice the time as before
> trying to go from point A to point B? One can easily see that this plan of
> endless (new) restrictions only works if there are fewer cars being driven
> around, which appears to be  DDOT's eventual solution to safety. Never mind
> the fact that Active Vehicle registrations in DC (per DC's DMV) have
> increased from 275K in 2010 to 360K in 2019 (a 30% increase over 10 years)
> per
> https://dmv.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dmv/page_content/attachments/Historical%20Registration%20Data%20FY2010-FY2019.pdf
>
>
> To sum it up: DDOT's approach to safety is to reduce parking availability,
> driving lanes and miles driven at the same time that vehicle registrations
> are on the rise. Does this make any sense?
>
> Zero accidents will eventually happen when we all own autonomous vehicles
> that always obey traffic laws and protect pedestrians/bikers, even when
> they (pedestrians/bikers) do not obey the traffic laws; I give it 10 years
> until it happens.
>
> Until then, influencing who our elected officials and representatives are,
> is the only path for those who would like to see a different approach to
> safety that does not reduce safety to a war on cars at a time that more DC
> residents own and operate cars.
>
> Finally, the zoom call with DDOT back in January was a stunning display of
> tone-deaf attitude and utter disregard for any viewpoint other than DDOT's.
>
> Thank you for your time reading,
> Yannis
>
> _______________________________________________
> LincolnParkDC mailing list
>
> To post to the list address your message to:
> LincolnParkDC at lincolnparkdc.info
> When replying, please consider whether to reply to the sender only, or to
> the list, which is the default.
> Not all replies are appropriate for the entire list.
>
> Please do not send administrative requests to the list. Please click on
> the following link to
> switch to digest mode, change your password, or otherwise manage your
> subscription:
> https://vps.woteki.com/mailman/listinfo/lincolnparkdc_lincolnparkdc.info
>
> If you need assistance managing your subscription, please address your
> request to: towncrier at lincolnparkdc.info
> Please do not address assistance requests to the list. Thank you for your
> cooperation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LincolnParkDC mailing list
>
> To post to the list address your message to:
> LincolnParkDC at lincolnparkdc.info
> When replying, please consider whether to reply to the sender only, or to
> the list, which is the default.
> Not all replies are appropriate for the entire list.
>
> Please do not send administrative requests to the list. Please click on
> the following link to
> switch to digest mode, change your password, or otherwise manage your
> subscription:
> https://vps.woteki.com/mailman/listinfo/lincolnparkdc_lincolnparkdc.info
>
> If you need assistance managing your subscription, please address your
> request to: towncrier at lincolnparkdc.info
> Please do not address assistance requests to the list. Thank you for your
> cooperation.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lincolnparkdc.info/pipermail/lincolnparkdc_lincolnparkdc.info/attachments/20210408/e27807fa/attachment.htm>